4.7 Article

Recovery of high-grade copper from waste printed circuit boards by mechanical-grinding assisted flotation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 232, 期 -, 页码 1251-1256

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.063

关键词

Waste printed circuit boards; Grinding pretreatment; Pyrolysis characteristics; Flotation; Cleaner recovery; High-grade copper

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2019BEE055]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation of Shandong University of Science and Technology for Recruited Talents [2017RCJJ035]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674161]
  4. SDUST Research Fund [2018TDJH101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mechanical grinding combined flotation technology with renewable collector has been proposed to recover high-grade copper from waste printed circuit boards (WPCBs). Surface morphology and element distribution of copper particle section were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM + EDS) technology. Results show that the copper particle is covered with a layer of micrometer-scale organic matter. Thermogravimetric analysis demonstrates the organic layer commonly existed on all of the particle surfaces, which prove that the pyrolysis method was not feasible for selectively removing the organic impurity. Mechanical grinding pretreatment was proposed to peel off the organic layer. Grinding experiment results show that impurity can be effectively separated from copper. Soap collector prepared from waste oil was used for flotation. The flotation results show that the copper grade of the concentrate first increased and then decreased with the increase of the grinding time, while the recovery gradually decreased from 78.7% to 21.7%. Concentrate with 79.1% copper grade and 71.5% recovery was obtained when the grinding time was 3 min. This study provides a physical approach to recover high-grade copper from WPCBs. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据