4.7 Article

Exploring reasons behind careful-use, energy-saving behaviours in residential sector based on the theory of planned behaviour: Evidence from Changchun, China

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 230, 期 -, 页码 29-37

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.101

关键词

Energy-saving behaviour; Careful-use behaviour; Theory of planned behaviour; Structural equation modelling; China

资金

  1. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [71503026, 71573113, 71690245]
  2. External Cooperation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [GJHZ1513]
  3. Dutch Research Council NOW [467-14-023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy-saving behaviours possess great potential for reducing residential energy consumption, which are influenced by various determinants. In this study, we classify the residential energy-saving behaviours into three categories: investment behaviours, control behaviours, and careful-use behaviours. Then, we further investigate the careful-use behaviours within the framework of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) based on the survey data collected in Changchun, China. Structural equation modelling is used to analyse the careful-use behaviours, which emphasise the effect of careful intentions on careful use behaviours and are further influenced by three driving factors, including attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behaviour control (PBC). The outstanding finding of this study is that, in the case of careful-use behaviours, subjective norm is the most important effect, as it differs significantly from previous studies concerning investment behaviours or other types of energy-saving behaviours. Policy implications for improving careful-use behaviours from the subjective norm perspective are provided accordingly. Widely implemented energy knowledge diffusion and energy information publicity are suggested, and a pro-environmental attitude should be improved through education. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据