4.6 Article

Carbon fibers modified with polypyrrole for headspace solid phase microextraction of trace amounts of 2-pentyl furan from breath samples

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1609, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460497

关键词

Carbon fibers; 2-Pentylfuran; Headspace solid-phase microextraction; Biomarkers

资金

  1. Research Council and Graduate School of Tarbiat Modares University (Tehran, Iran)
  2. Chemistry & Chemical Engineering Research Center of Iran (Tehran, Iran)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces micrometric carbon strands as a suitable fiber for headspace solid phase microextraction. Compared to previous supports, carbon fibers have mechanical flexibility, wide thermal expansion, and a large surface area, which is an important factor in headspace solid phase microextraction. The electrophoretic technique was applied to modify the surface of stainless steel and carbon fibers with polypyrrole. Modified carbon fibers were used for extraction of 2-pentylfuran (2-PF) as a model analyte from patients' breath and coffee samples. 2-PF belongs to the furan family, which was suggested as a biomarker for Aspergillus fumigatus and was classified as a possible carcinogen. 2-PF can be found in many heat-processed foods and drinks. The separation and detection of the analyte was performed by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. The effective factors in the extraction performance of the analyte by carbon fiber supports were investigated and optimized. Under optimized extraction conditions (temperature, 20 degrees C; time, 15 min; desorption temperature, 200 degrees C; desorption time, 2 min; salt concentration, 10% w/v; and stirring rate, 700 rpm), the limit of detection was calculated as 0.05 ng mL(-1), whereas repeatability and fiber-to-fiber reproducibility (RSD %) was found to be in the range of 3.2-4.1%. The experimental results showed that the proposed fiber had greater extraction performance for 2-pentylfuran. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据