4.5 Article

Thermodynamic solubility modelling, solvent effect and preferential solvation of p-nitrobenzamide in aqueous co-solvent mixtures of dimethyl sulfoxide, ethanol, isopropanol and ethylene glycol

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 123-131

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2019.05.007

关键词

p-Nitrobenzamide; Solubility; Jouyban-Acree; Inverse Kirkwood-Buff integrals; Preferential solvation; Solvent effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The equilibrium p-nitrobenzamide solubility in mixtures of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 1) + water (2), ethanol (1) + water (2), isopropanol (1) + water (2) and ethylene glycol (EG, 1) + water (2) was determined with a shake-flask method from (293.15 to 328.15) K under atmospheric pressure (101.1 kPa). At the same temperature and mass fraction of DMSO (ethanol, isopropanol or EG), the mole fraction solubility of p-nitrobenzamide was greater in (DMSO + water) than in ethanol (1) + water (2), isopropanol (1) + water (2) and ethylene glycol (EG, 1) + water (2) mixtures. X-Ray power diffraction analysis of solid phase showed no polymorphic transformation or solvate formation in experiments. The degree of relative importance of solute-solvent and solvent-solvent interactions on the solubility variation was evaluated by the linear solvation energy relationship analysis of solvent effect. The inverse Kirkwood-Buff integrals was used to study the preferential solvation based on thermodynamic solution properties. The parameters of preferential solvation for ethanol and isopropanol were positive in the ethanol (1) + water (2) and isopropanol (1) + water (2) mixtures in co-solvent-rich and intermediate composition, indicating that p-nitrobenzamide was solvated preferentially by the co-solvent. p-Nitrobenzamide acted mainly as a Lewis acid interacting with proton-acceptor functional groups of the co-solvents. Moreover, the drugs' solubility was represented mathematically via the Jouyban-Acree model attaining the average relative deviations smaller than 2.16%. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据