4.7 Article

Multicomponent coupled cluster singles and doubles and Brueckner doubles methods: Proton densities and energies

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 151, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5116113

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Offices of Basic Energy Sciences and Advanced Scientific Computing Research, Scientific Discovery through the Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nuclear-electronic orbital (NEO) framework enables computationally practical coupled cluster calculations of multicomponent molecular systems, in which all electrons and specified nuclei, typically protons, are treated quantum mechanically. In addition to energies, computing accurate proton densities is essential for the calculation of reliable molecular properties, including vibrationally averaged geometries and vibrational frequencies. Herein, the Lagrangian formalism for the multicomponent coupled cluster with single and double excitations (NEO-CCSD) method is derived and implemented. The multicomponent coupled cluster with double excitations method using optimized Brueckner orbitals, denoted as NEO-BCCD, is also developed. Both of these methods are used to compute the proton densities for two molecular systems. The results illustrate that orbital relaxation effects, which can be included either indirectly with the NEO-CCSD method or directly with the NEO-BCCD method, are critical for computing even qualitatively accurate proton densities. Both methods are also able to provide accurate proton affinities and vibrationally averaged optimized geometries. This Lagrangian formalism will enable the calculation of other properties such as analytical nuclear gradients and Hessians with NEO coupled cluster methods. Moreover, the accuracy of these methods may be improved systematically by the inclusion of higher-order excitations. Thus, this work provides the foundation for a wide range of future methodological developments and applications within the NEO framework.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据