4.5 Article

DCAF8, a novel MuRF1 interaction partner, promotes muscle atrophy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 132, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.233395

关键词

Atrophy; Cullin; MuRF1

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FI 965/4-1, SO 271/6-1]
  2. MaxDelbruck-Center for Molecular Medicine
  3. Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC)
  4. GO-Bio Initiative of the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung) [0313881]
  5. ERA-NET NEURON initiative - BMBF [01W1301]
  6. Berlin Institute of Health Collaborative Research - BMBF [1.1.2. a. 3]
  7. Helmholtz Validation Fund - Helmholtz Association, Germany [HVF-0013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The muscle-specific RING-finger protein MuRF1 (also known as TRIM63) constitutes a bona fide ubiquitin ligase that routes proteins like several different myosin heavy chain proteins (MyHC) to proteasomal degradation during muscle atrophy. In two unbiased screens, we identified DCAF8 as a new MuRF1-binding partner. MuRF1 physically interacts with DCAF8 and both proteins localize to overlapping structures in muscle cells. Importantly, similar to what is seen for MuRF1, DCAF8 levels increase during atrophy, and the downregulation of either protein substantially impedes muscle wasting and MyHC degradation in C2C12 myotubes, a model system for muscle differentiation and atrophy. DCAF proteins typically serve as substrate receptors for cullin 4-type (Cul4) ubiquitin ligases (CRL), and we demonstrate that DCAF8 and MuRF1 associate with the subunits of such a protein complex. Because genetic downregulation of DCAF8 and inhibition of cullin activity also impair myotube atrophy in C2C12 cells, our data imply that the DCAF8 promotes muscle wasting by targeting proteins like MyHC as an integral substrate receptor of a Cul4A-containing ring ubiquitin ligase complex (CRL4A). This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据