4.2 Article

Right Ventricular Hypertrophy in Refractory Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Treated With Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.08.035

关键词

acute respiratory distress syndrome; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; echocardiography; right ventricle; hypertrophy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: In severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), right ventricular (RV failure) and dilation have been investigated with the use of echocardiography, whereas RV hypertrophy has not been addressed in the literature. The present study assessed the incidence of RV hypertrophy using echocardiography before ECMO treatment and at intensive care unit (ICU) discharge in severe ARDS patients. Design: Observational, retrospective, single-center study. Setting: A single ECMO center. Participants: The study comprised 46 consecutive patients with severe ARDS. Intervention: Echocardiographic evaluation and ECMO support. Measurements and Main Results: A dual-lumen cannula was implanted in most patients (38/46 [82.6%]). Before the start of ECMO, RV hypertrophy was present in 28 patients (60.8%) with no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 subgroups. The ICU mortality rate was 30.4% (14/46), with no difference between patients with RV hypertrophy and those without. At ICU discharge, all patients showed RV hypertrophy. Conclusions: In severe ARDS treated with ECMO support, RV hypertrophy is a common finding and patients with normal RV wall thickness developed RV hypertrophy after ECMO support. The latter finding may suggest that during ECMO support, the right ventricle still may be subjected to increased afterload. However, additional research should be performed to elucidate the spectrum of mechanism(s) involved in the genesis of RV hypertrophy. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据