4.2 Article

Axons Embedded in a Tissue May Withstand Larger Deformations Than Isolated Axons Before Mechanoporation Occurs

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4044953

关键词

DAI; injury thresholds; mechanoporation; multiscale

资金

  1. European Union [642662]
  2. Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing [SNIC2017-1-491]
  3. Swedish Research Council [VR-2016-05314]
  4. Swedish Research Council [2016-05314] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffuse axonal injury (DAI) is the pathological consequence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that most of all requires a multiscale approach in order to be, first, understood and then possibly prevented. While in fact the mechanical insult usually happens at the head (or macro) level, the consequences affect structures at the cellular (or microlevel). The quest for axonal injury tolerances has so far been addressed both with experimental and computational approaches. On one hand, the experimental approach presents challenges connected to both temporal and spatial resolution in the identification of a clear axonal injury trigger after the application of a mechanical load. On the other hand, computational approaches usually consider axons as homogeneous entities and therefore are unable to make inferences about their viability, which is thought to depend on subcellular damages. Here, we propose a computational multiscale approach to investigate the onset of axonal injury in two typical experimental scenarios. We simulated single-cell and tissue stretch injury using a composite finite element axonal model in isolation and embedded in a matrix, respectively. Inferences on axonal damage are based on the comparison between axolemma strains and previously established mechanoporation thresholds. Our results show that, axons embedded in a tissue could withstand higher deformations than isolated axons before mechanoporation occurred and this is exacerbated by the increase in strain rate from 1/s to 10/s.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据