4.7 Article

Jute-based porous biomass carbon composited by Fe3O4 nanoparticles as an excellent microwave absorber

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 803, 期 -, 页码 1119-1126

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.351

关键词

Porous jute biomass carbon; Fe3O4/PJBC composites; Microwave absorption performances; Interfaces; Dielectric loss

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology of Yunnan Province [2019FB-13, 2017FA025]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61761047, 41876055]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation of Yunnan Education Department [2019J0002]
  4. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Project of Yunnan University [201804004]
  5. Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) in University of Yunnan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous jute biomass carbon (PJBC) composited by Fe3O4 nanoparticles were successfully prepared by a chemical coprecipitation method at a low temperature of 60 degrees C, which is very simple to prepare a high degree of purity of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. The structure, morphology, and microwave absorption performances of the Fe3O4/PJBC composites were investigated in detail. Due to the porous structure and large interfaces between Fe3O4 and PJBC, the Fe3O4/PJBC composites show excellent microwave absorption performances. The minimum reflection loss (RL) value of -39.5 dB is obtained for the Fe3O4/PJBC composites at the frequency of 6.4 GHz. When the thickness is only 1.6 mm, an effective absorption bandwidth (RL <= -10 dB) for 5 GHz is achieved from 13.8 to 17.8 GHz. The excellent microwave absorption performances for the Fe3O4/PJBC composites are rooted in enhanced impedance matching, large interfaces, ionic polarization, eddy loss, natural resonance, and multiple reflection and scattering. Consequently, considering market applications and the cost, the Fe3O4/PJBC composite in this work can be a promising candidate for microwave absorber. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据