4.5 Article

Adsorptive removal of anionic dye (Reactive Black 5) from aqueous solution using chemically modified banana peel powder: kinetic, isotherm, thermodynamic, and reusability studies

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOREMEDIATION
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 267-278

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2019.1658709

关键词

Adsorption; isotherms; kinetics; Reactive Black 5; thermodynamics

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [107-2625-M-224-002, 107-2625-M-224-004]
  2. FENGTAY Foundation, Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The removal of Reactive Black 5 (RB5) using chemically modified banana peel powder (CMBPP) from aqueous solution was dealt with in the present investigation. Factors affecting the adsorption of RB5 (like pH solution, agitation speed, initial concentration of RB5, contact time and temperature) were investigated. FTIR, SEM-EDX, BET and Elemental analysis characterized the adsorbent material. Adsorption kinetic results evaluated by non-linear pseudo-second-order model was fitted well and showed good correlation with the experimental data than the pseudo-first-order model. The experimental equilibrium data evaluated by non-linear Langmuir, Freundlich, Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R), and Temkin equations and the experimental data were well described by the Langmuir isotherm model. Langmuir monolayer sorption capacity of RB5 onto CMBPP was observed at pH 3.0 (211.8 mg/g). The values of thermodynamic parameters revealed that the sorption process was feasible, spontaneous, endothermic, and physisorption in nature, i.e. (Delta G degrees <0, Delta H degrees > 0, and Delta S degrees > 0). Desorption studies reveal that the maximum recovery of RB5 when 0.1 M NaOH solution used as a desorbent. The CMBPP also exhibited excellent regeneration efficiency for the five cycles of successive adsorption-desorption. The results exposed that CMBPP could use as a prospective adsorbent material for the removal of RB5 from aqueous media.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据