4.7 Article

Hyaluronic acid-coated pH sensitive poly (β-amino ester) nanoparticles for co-delivery of embelin and TRAIL plasmid for triple negative breast cancer treatment

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118637

关键词

Hyaluronic acid; pH-sensitive; Embelin; Plasmid; Co-delivery

资金

  1. Macao Science and Technology Development Fund [083/2017/A2]
  2. Research Fund of the University of Macau [MYRG2016-00130-ICMS-QRCM, MYRG2017-00182-ICMS]
  3. Key Laboratory of Polymeric Composite & Functional Materials of Ministry of Education [PCFM-2016-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) still lacks an effective targeted treatment. In this study, hyaluronic acid (HA)-mediated tumor targeting and pH-sensitive amphiphilic polymeric nanoparticles were designed and prepared to co-deliver the anticancer drug embelin (EMB) and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) plasmid (pTRAIL) (EMB/TRAIL-HA/PBAE-PEI) for synergistic anti-breast cancer efficacy. These pH-sensitive amphiphilic polymeric nanoparticles were formed using the amphiphilic polymers polyethyleneimine (PEI)-poly[(1,6-hexanediol)-diacrylate-beta-5-hydroxyamylamine] (PBAE), which was synthesized via Michael addition polymerization. Taking advantage of the specific binding between HA and CD44, which is highly expressed in MDA-MB-231 TNBC cells, the HA-coated nanoparticles increased drug uptake in MDA-MB231 TNBC cells compared with MCF-7 non-TNBC cells with lower CD44 expression. Moreover, EMB/TRAIL-HA/PBAE-PEI exhibited enhanced cytotoxic and pro-apoptotic effects against MDA-MB-231 cells compared with free EMB and EMB- or pTRAIL-loaded nanoparticles via activation of caspase 3/7, an increase in reactive oxygen species levels, and inhibition of the expressions of apoptosis-related proteins. These results demonstrated that EMB/TRAIL-HA/PBAE-PEI exerted enhanced cytotoxic and pro-apoptotic effects against MDA-MB-231 cells and showed great potential for TNBC treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据