4.7 Article

Electrochemically engineering defect-rich nickel-iron layered double hydroxides as a whole water splitting electrocatalyst

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 44, 期 42, 页码 23689-23698

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.082

关键词

Layered double hydroxides; Defects; Oxygen evolution reaction; Hydrogen evolution; Water splitting

资金

  1. Foundation of Jilin Educational Committee [JJKH20181091KJ]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [21603017]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province, China [20170101095JC]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M601355]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well proved that fabricating more defects on basal plane of layered double hydroxides (LDHs) is one of effective ways to boost the electrocatalytic performance for oxygen evolution reaction (OER). For the first time, the nickel iron LDHs (NiFe LDHs) with hierarchical morphology and abundant defects are simultaneously constructed by one-step electro-deposition (ED) strategy with easy operation, time-saving and green chemistry. Remarkably, the morphology is elaborately tailored by changing the species of doped anions which is unique. Also, the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results elucidate that the Fe sites are in electron-rich state in LDHs which is revealed to enhance the catalytic activity strongly arising from the generation of oxygen vacancy. To deliver the current density of 10 mA cm(-2), the optimal NiFe LDHs require the overpotential of 128, 106 mV for OER and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), and achieve 100 mA cm(-2) at the overpotential of 237, 242 mV, respectively. As a bifunctional electrocatalyst, the NiFe LDHs exhibit the current density of 10 mA cm(-2) at a cell voltage of 1.55 V and 100 mA cm(-2) at 1.76 V, which are lower than that of most of benchmarking materials reported previously. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据