4.7 Article

W-doped ordered mesoporous Ni-Al2O3 catalyst for methanation of carbon monoxide

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 44, 期 43, 页码 23975-23982

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.115

关键词

Ordered mesopores catalyst; WO3; Confinement effect; CO methanation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21606146]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation of Shandong University of Science and Technology for Recruited Talents [2016RCJJ005]
  3. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering [2018-K29]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to simultaneously inhibit the Ni sintering and coke formation as well as investigate the effects of WO3 promoter on catalytic performance, the ordered mesoporous Ni-WO3/Al2O3 catalysts were synthesized by a facile one-pot evaporation-induced self-assembly method for CO methanation reaction to produce synthetic natural gas. Addition of WO3 species could significantly promote the catalytic activity due to the enhancement of the Ni reducibility and the increase of active centers, and the optimal N10W5/OMA catalyst with NiO of 10 wt% and WO3 of 5 wt% achieved the maximum CH4 yield 80% at 425 degrees C, 0.1 MPa and a weight hourly space velocity of 60000 mL g(-1) h(-1). Besides, the reference catalyst N10W5/OMA-Im prepared by the conventional co-impregnation method was also evaluated. Compared with N10W5/OMA, N10W5/OMA-Im showed lower catalytic activity due to the partial block of channels by Ni and WO3 nanoparticles, which reduced active centers and restrict the mass transfer during the reaction. In addition, the N10W5/OMA catalyst showed superior anti-sintering and anti-coking properties in a 425 degrees C-100 h-lifetime test, mainly because of confinement effect of ordered mesoporous structure to anchor the Ni particle in the alumina matrix. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据