4.7 Article

Synthesis of carbon nanofibers/poly(para-phenylenediamine)/nickel particles nanocomposite for enhanced methanol electrooxidation

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 44, 期 45, 页码 24534-24545

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.141

关键词

Poly(para-phenylenediamine); Carbon nanofibers; Nickel particles; Methanol electrooxidation

资金

  1. MESRSFC (Ministere de I'Enseignment Superieur et de la Recherche Scientifique et de la Formation des Cadres du Maroc)
  2. CNRST (Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technique) [PPR/2015/72]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several studies have been conducted on direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) to resolve major issues such as the high cost of the catalyst and the poisoning of the electrode. Herein, a low-cost catalyst based on nickel particles (NiPs), carbon nanofibers (CNF) and poly(para-phenylenediamine) (PpPD) was carried out using a simple electrochemical method. The morphology and structure of the nanocomposite electrodes are characterized by field-emission gun scanning electron microscopy coupled with an energy dispersive X-ray detector, X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy. The effects of various parameters such as the PpPD film thickness and the NiPs content on the electrocatalytic performance of CPE/CNF/PpPD/NiPs are evaluated which lead to the optimized composition. The results of the methanol electrooxidation reaction at room temperature showed that the optimized CPE/CNF/PpPD/NiPs nanocomposite exhibits a high catalytic activity (I-p = 38.11 mA cm(-2)), good stability and durability for more than 6 in comparison with CPE/CNF/NiPs. These findings truly highlight the synergetic effect of CNF/PpPD in enhancing the electrochemical activity and stability and the vast potential of CPE/CNF/PpPD/NiPs as low-cost catalyst and electrodes for DMFCs. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据