4.7 Article

Investigation of two-hole flash-boiling plume-to-plume interaction and its impact on spray collapse

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.04.111

关键词

Flash-boiling spray; Two-hole spray; Plume-to-plume interaction; Spray collapse

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51376119/E060502]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flash boiling can enhance fuel breakup and atomization via the quick growth and eruption of bubbles when the high temperature fuel exiting the nozzle. For multi-hole fuel injectors, a high level of flash boiling might cause the plumes to merge into a single plume. Such phenomenon is known as spray collapse, which will change the preset spray targeting in real engines, and is not desirable for practical application due to a longer penetration it might cause. Although extensive works have been done on the collapse of flash-boiling, no consensus has been reached for its core mechanisms yet. This work used a two-hole injector to study the flash-boiling plume-to-plume interaction, which is considered to be a key inducement of spray collapse. Optical measurement approaches were used to examine the influence of fuel temperature, ambient pressure, and injection pressure on the morphology of the flash boiling spray. It was found that a secondary plume was generated by two primary plumes side-collision in the spray central region under some flash-boiling conditions, and its behavior had a clear relation with the level of flash-boiling and other boundary conditions. Additionally, elevating injection pressure and increasing ambient pressure are two doable options for controlling the flash-boiling targeting in real engines, through which non-collapse flash-boiling sprays can be obtained. Finally, the relation between the secondary plume and the spray collapse was clearly demonstrated, and possible collapse mechanism was discussed in details. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据