4.7 Article

Single Image Dehazing via Multi-scale Convolutional Neural Networks with Holistic Edges

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION
卷 128, 期 1, 页码 240-259

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-019-01235-8

关键词

Image dehazing; Image defogging; Convolutional neural network; Transmission map

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0803701]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [KZ201910005007]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1636214, U1803264, U1605252, 61802403, 61602464, 61872421, 61922043]
  4. Peng Cheng Laboratory Project of Guangdong Province [PCL2018KP004]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180471, YF20180101]
  6. CCF-DiDi GAIA [YF20180101]
  7. CCF-Tencent Open Fund
  8. Zhejiang Lab's International Talent Fund for Young Professionals
  9. Open Projects Program of the National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition
  10. Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering [CAREER 1149783]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single image dehazing has been a challenging problem which aims to recover clear images from hazy ones. The performance of existing image dehazing methods is limited by hand-designed features and priors. In this paper, we propose a multi-scale deep neural network for single image dehazing by learning the mapping between hazy images and their transmission maps. The proposed algorithm consists of a coarse-scale net which predicts a holistic transmission map based on the entire image, and a fine-scale net which refines dehazed results locally. To train the multi-scale deep network, we synthesize a dataset comprised of hazy images and corresponding transmission maps based on the NYU Depth dataset. In addition, we propose a holistic edge guided network to refine edges of the estimated transmission map. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed algorithm performs favorably against the state-of-the-art methods on both synthetic and real-world images in terms of quality and speed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据