4.7 Article

Physicochemical and in vitro digestion of millet starch: Effect of moisture content in microwave

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.046

关键词

Millet starch; Microwave treatment; Moisture; Physicochemical properties; Digestive properties

资金

  1. 2018 Baodi District Agricultural Science and Technology Plan Project (Major project) [201814]
  2. Baodi District Industry-University-Research Sci-tech Cooperation Project
  3. National Engineering Research Center of Pesticides, Nankai University (Tianjin)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the physicochemical and in vitro digestion of millet starch with different moisture content after microwave treatment were investigated. The structure and property changes of native (NA) and microwave treated (MT) millet starches were characterized using Brabender viscometer, Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Microwave treatment caused a decrease of the peak viscosity, swelling power, Delta H and relative crystalline, and an increase of the transparency, T-0, T-c, and Delta T. The extent of these changes depended on the moisture content of starches. The in vitro enzymatic digestibility of samples increased greatly, especially at a moisture content of >40%. It is interesting to note that the peak of the hydroxyl group shifted toward the lower wavenumber direction and the decrease of peak intensities at 1047 cm(-1) and 1022 cm(-1) in FT-IR spectra indicated that higher moisture content enhanced the inter-molecular hydrogen bonding and caused more serious damage to the crystalline and amorphous regions. Cracks and center cavities were observed on the granules surface and the original appearance of starch disappeared gradually as the moisture content increases. In conclusion, high moisture content can enhance the effect of the microwave to millet starch. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据