4.7 Article

Cooking, morphological, mechanical and digestion properties of cooked rice with suppression of starch branching enzymes

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.210

关键词

Cooked rice; Starch branching enzyme; In situ gelatinization; Pasting properties; Rheological properties; Textural properties

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31270221]
  2. Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province of China
  3. Talent Project of Yangzhou University
  4. Doctoral Program of Yangzhou University
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kernel components and some physicochemical properties of cooked rice were investigated and compared between a popular japonica rice Wu-xiang 9915 (WX) and its transgenic line (WX-SBEI/IIb(-)) with suppression of starch branching enzyme I/Ilb. The starch content, especially amylopectin content, was significantly lower in WX-SBEI/lib(-) than in WX. Brown rice flour had markedly higher gelatinization temperature in WX-SBEI/IIb(-) than in WX. The cooked kernels of WX-SBEI/Ilb(-) had significantly lower volume swelling, leached material amount and wet weight than those of WX during cooking. Starch granules in WX kernel could be gelatinized completely and gradually from the exterior to the interior of endosperm, leading to breakage of cooked kernels. However, aggregate, elongated and small starch granules in the exterior of WX-SBEI/Ilb(-) endosperm could not be gelatinized completely and remained their morphologies during cooking, leading to a high resistance of kernels to cooking. Brown rice flour of WX-SBEI/Ilb(-) had significantly lower pasting viscosities, storage modulus and loss modulus but higher loss angle tangent than that of WX. The cooked kernels of WX-SBEI/IIb(-) had considerably higher hardness, springiness and cohesiveness but lower adhesiveness than those of WX. The starch in cooked kernels was more resistant to digestion in WX-SBEI/Ilb(-) than in WX. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据