4.7 Article

Deep ranking based cost-sensitive multi-label learning for distant supervision relation extraction

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102096

关键词

Distant supervision; Relation extraction; Class ties; Class imbalance; Multi-label learning; Cost-sensitive learning; Deep ranking

资金

  1. National High-tech Research and Development Program (863 Program) [2014AA015105]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61602490]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Knowledge base provides a potential way to improve the intelligence of information retrieval (IR) systems, for that knowledge base has numerous relations between entities which can help the IR systems to conduct inference from one entity to another entity. Relation extraction is one of the fundamental techniques to construct a knowledge base. Distant supervision is a semi-supervised learning method for relation extraction which learns with labeled and unlabeled data. However, this approach suffers the problem of relation overlapping in which one entity tuple may have multiple relation facts. We believe that relation types can have latent connections, which we call class ties, and can be exploited to enhance relation extraction. However, this property between relation classes has not been fully explored before. In this paper, to exploit class ties between relations to improve relation extraction, we propose a general ranking based multi-label learning framework combined with convolutional neural networks, in which ranking based loss functions with regularization technique are introduced to learn the latent connections between relations. Furthermore, to deal with the problem of class imbalance in distant supervision relation extraction, we further adopt cost-sensitive learning to rescale the costs from the positive and negative labels. Extensive experiments on a widely used dataset show the effectiveness of our model to exploit class ties and to relieve class imbalance problem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据