4.7 Article

Simple and facile preparation of lignosulfonate-based composite nanoparticles with tunable morphologies: From sphere to vesicle

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 135, 期 -, 页码 64-71

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.04.024

关键词

Lignosulfonate; Silica; Composite; Self-assembly; Hydrolyzation

资金

  1. Science and Technology Project of Henan Province [182102210003]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province [162300410202]
  3. Key Scientific Research Project of Higher Education of Henan Province [16A530007, 17A150015, 17A150039, 17B430002, 18b610009]
  4. National Science Foundation of China [U1804128]
  5. 1000 Young Talent

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lignosulfonate/SiO2 composite nanoparticles with tunable morphologies (sphere, hollow, and vesicle) were prepared in this work. Sodium lignosulfonate (NaLS) was first modified by cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) to increase its hydrophobicity and then dissolved in pure ethanol in the presence of tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS). Following the continuous addition of ammonia aqueous solution, NaLS started to form sphere micelles by self-assembly at a critical water content. TEOS droplets were first stabilized by NaLS micelles and then hydrolyzed and condensed to form Si-O-Si under the catalysis of ammonia. Uniform sphere composite particles with small particle size (70 (similar to)200 nm) were achieved with lower TEOS content in the primary solution, while composite particles with hollow or vesicle morphologies were obtained with higher TEOS content. Finally, NaLS/SiO2 composite sphere particles (112 nm) were used for the in-situ encapsulation of doxorubicin (Dox) drugs and the release profile and antitumor effects were investigated and compared with those of free Dox. This simple and facile method, involving tunable particle size and morphologies, and potential drug or gene delivery capacity allow for further applications of these green, sustainable composite nanoparticles in many fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据