4.6 Article

Modified Water Hyacinth Functionalized with Citric Acid as an Effective and Inexpensive Adsorbent for Heavy Metal-Ion Removal

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 58, 期 40, 页码 18508-18518

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b03401

关键词

-

资金

  1. Key Laboratory of Jiangxi Province for Persistent Pollutants Control and Resources Recycle, Nanchang Hangkong University [ES201980204]
  2. Support Program of Key Laboratory of Southern Farmland Pollution Prevention and Control from Hunan division of GRG Metrology and Test

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water hyacinth was modified by citric acid to prepare a carboxyl-functionalized water hyacinth (CWH) adsorption material. The effects of pH, contact time, amount of the adsorbent, initial concentration, and temperature on the adsorption of heavy metal ions were investigated. In the experimental study, the optimal pH values of Ni2+, Cu2+, and Cr6+ in the CWH adsorption solution were 7.5, 6.0, and 5.0; the optimum contact times were 300, 180, and 120 min; and the optimum adsorbent dosages were 0.65, 0.50, and 0.40 g, respectively. The adsorption processes of Ni2+, Cu2+, and Cr6+ by CWH are in accordance with the quasi-second-order kinetic model and Langmuir model, with the maximum adsorption capacity being 59.64, 77.98, and 96.89 mg/g, respectively. The thermodynamic model shows that it is an endothermic spontaneous process. Even after five adsorption-desorption cycles, the removal ratios of Ni2+, Cu2+, and Cr6+ by CWH remained about 55.23, 65.63, and 71.46%, respectively. The structure of the water hyacinth before and after modification was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The results indicate that the surface of CWH was rough and the number of microporous increased and water hyacinth has been successfully carboxylated. The abovementioned results indicate that CWH can be used as an environmentally friendly and economical adsorbent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据