4.7 Article

Unified Analysis of HetNets Using Poisson Cluster Processes Under Max-Power Association

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 18, 期 8, 页码 3797-3812

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2019.2917904

关键词

Heterogeneous cellular network; 3GPP; Poisson cluster process; Thomas cluster process; Matern cluster process

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [CNS-1617896]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [16K00030]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K00030] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Owing to its flexibility in modeling real-world spatial configurations of users and base stations (BSs), the Poisson cluster process (PCP) has recently emerged as an appealing way to model and analyze heterogeneous cellular networks (HetNets). Despite its undisputed relevance to HetNets-corroborated by the models used in the industry-the PCP's use in performance analysis has been limited. This is primarily because of the lack of analytical tools to characterize the performance metrics, such as the coverage probability of a user connected to the strongest BS. In this paper, we develop an analytical framework for the evaluation of the coverage probability, or equivalently the complementary cumulative density function (CCDF) of signal-to-interference-and-noise ratio (SINR), of a typical user in a K-tier HetNet under a max power-based association strategy, where the BS locations of each tier follow either a Poisson point process (PPP) or a PCP. The key enabling step involves conditioning on the parent PPPs of all the PCPs, which allows us to express the coverage probability as a product of sum-product and probability generating functionals (PGFLs) of the parent PPPs. In addition to several useful insights, our analysis provides a rigorous way to study the impact of the cluster size on the SINR distribution, which was not possible using the existing PPP-based models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据