4.7 Article

Online State-of-Health Estimation for Li-Ion Battery Using Partial Charging Segment Based on Support Vector Machine

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 68, 期 9, 页码 8583-8592

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2019.2927120

关键词

Electric vehicle; energy storage; batteries; state estimation; state-of-health

资金

  1. China Association for Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The online estimation of battery state-of-health (SOH) is an ever significant issue for the intelligent energy management of the autonomous electric vehicles. Machine-learning based approaches are promising for the online SOH estimation. This paper proposes a machine-learning based algorithm for the online SOH estimation of Li-ion battery. A predictive diagnosis model used in the algorithm is established based on support vector machine (SVM). The support vectors, which reflects the intrinsic characteristics of the Li-ion battery, are determined from the charging data of fresh cells. Furthermore, the coefficients of the SVMs for cells at different SOH are identified once the support vectors are determined. The algorithm functions by comparing partial charging curves with the stored SVMs. Similarity factor is defined after comparison to quantify the SOH of the data under evaluation. The operation of the algorithm only requires partial charging curves, e.g., 15 min charging curves, making fast on-board diagnosis of battery SOH into reality. The partial charging curves can be intercepted from a wide range of voltage section, thereby relieving the pain that there is little chance that the driver charges the battery pack from a predefined state-of-charge. Train, validation, and test are conducted for two commercial Li-ion batteries with Li(NiCoMn)(1/3) O-2 cathode and graphite anode, indicating that the algorithm can estimate the battery SOH with less than 2% error for 80% of all the cases, and less than 3% error for 95% of all the cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据