4.8 Article

An IPT Battery Charger With Near Unity Power Factor and Load-Independent Constant Output Combating Design Constraints of Input Voltage and Transformer Parameters

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 34, 期 8, 页码 7719-7727

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2018.2881207

关键词

Inductive power transfer (IPT) battery charger; LCC-LCC compensation; load-independent outputs; soft switching; unity power factor

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20181280]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of China
  3. Hong Kong RGC General Research Fund [PolyU 152082/17E]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inductive power transfer (IPT) techniques are becoming popular in battery charging applications due to some unique advantages compared to the conventional plug-in systems. A high-performance IPT charger should provide the battery with an efficient charging profile consisting of constant charging current and constant charging voltage. However, with a wide load range, it is hard to realize the initial load-independent constant current (CC) and the subsequent load-independent constant voltage (CV) using a single IPT converter while maintaining nearly unity power factor and soft switching of power switches simultaneously. This paper systematically analyzed the characteristics of an LCC-LCC compensated IPT converter and proposed a design method to realize the required load-independent CC and CV outputs at two zero-phase angle frequencies. The design also combats the constraints of an IPT transformer and input voltage, thus facilitating the use of a simple duty cycle control operating at two fixed frequencies for both CC and CV operations. The design criteria, control logic, and sensitivities of compensation parameters to the input impedance and load-independent output are discussed. Finally, an IPT battery charger prototype with 1 A charging current and 24 V battery voltage is built to verify the analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据