4.7 Article

Direct Automatic Coronary Calcium Scoring in Cardiac and Chest CT

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
卷 38, 期 9, 页码 2127-2138

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2899534

关键词

Calcium scoring; cardiac CT; chest CT; deep learning; convolutional neural network; atlas-registration; regression

资金

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [12726]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the global leading cause of death. A strong risk factor for CVD events is the amount of coronary artery calcium (CAC). To meet the demands of the increasing interest in quantification of CAC, i.e., coronary calcium scoring, especially as an unrequested finding for screening and research, automatic methods have been proposed. The current automatic calcium scoring methods are relatively computationally expensive and only provide scores for one type of CT. To address this, we propose a computationally efficient method that employs two convolutional neural networks: the first performs registration to align the fields of view of input CTs and the second performs direct regression of the calcium score, thereby circumventing time-consuming intermediate CAC segmentation. Optional decision feedback provides insight into the regions that are contributed to the calcium score. Experiments were performed using 903 cardiac CT and 1687 chest CT scans. The method predicted calcium scores in less than 0.3 s. The intra-class correlation coefficient between predicted and manual calcium scores was 0.98 for both cardiac and chest CT. The method showed almost perfect agreement between automatic and manual CVD risk categorization in both the datasets, with a linearly weighted Cohen's kappa of 0.95 in cardiac CT and 0.93 in chest CT. Performance is similar to that of the state-of-the-art methods, but the proposed method is hundreds of times faster. By providing visual feedback, insight is given in the decision process, making it readily implementable in clinical and research settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据