4.7 Article

Learning a Probabilistic Model for Diffeomorphic Registration

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
卷 38, 期 9, 页码 2165-2176

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2897112

关键词

Deformable registration; probabilistic encoding; deep learning; conditional variational autoencoder; latent variable model; deformation transport

资金

  1. AAP Sante [06 2017-260 DGA-DSH]
  2. INRIA Sophia Antipolis-Mediterranee, NEF computation cluster

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose to learn a low-dimensional probabilistic deformation model from data which can be used for the registration and the analysis of deformations. The latent variable model maps similar deformations close to each other in an encoding space. It enables to compare deformations, to generate normal or pathological deformations for any new image, or to transport deformations from one image pair to any other image. Our unsupervised method is based on the variational inference. In particular, we use a conditional variational autoencoder network and constrain transformations to be symmetric and diffeomorphic by applying a differentiable exponentiation layer with a symmetric loss function. We also present a formulation that includes spatial regularization such as the diffusion-based filters. In addition, our framework provides multi-scale velocity field estimations. We evaluated our method on 3-D intra-subject registration using 334 cardiac cine-MRIs. On this dataset, our method showed the state-of-the-art performance with a mean DICE score of 81.2% and a mean Hausdorff distance of 7.3 mm using 32 latent dimensions compared to three state-of-the-art methods while also demonstrating more regular deformation fields. The average time per registration was 0.32 s. Besides, we visualized the learned latent space and showed that the encoded deformations can be used to transport deformations and to cluster diseases with a classification accuracy of 83% after applying a linear projection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据