4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Analysis of CYGNSS Data for Soil Moisture Retrieval

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2895510

关键词

CYGNSS; Global Navigation Satellite System-Reflectometry (GNSS-R); global positioning system (GPS); remote sensing; satellite; soil moisture (SM); soil moisture active passive (SMAP); soil moisture and ocean salinity (SMOS)

资金

  1. European Space Agency within the framework of a project entitled Potentials of Spaceborne GNSS-R over Land [4000120299/17/NL/AF/hh]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data from the CYGNSS mission, originally conceived to monitor tropical cyclones, are being investigated here for land applications as well. In this paper, a methodology for soil moisture (SM) retrieval from CYGNSS data is presented. The approach derives Level 3 gridded daily SM estimations, over the latitudinal band covered by CYGNSS, at a resolution of 36 km x 36 km, using the CYGNSS reflectivity over land, coupled with ancillary vegetation and roughness information from the SMAP mission. The results are compared globally with SM measurements from SMAP, which are assumed to be ground truth, showing a good agreement, and a global root-mean-square difference of 0.07 cm(3)/cm(3). A more extensive comparison is performed over two test regions-Texas in the United States and New South Wales in Australia-where reference data from SMAP are complemented with measurements from the SMOS mission. The results over both regions are generally consistent with the global results, and a good agreement is observed between CYGNSS and reference SM measurements from SMAP and SMOS. The study demonstrates that SM can be successfully retrieved from the CYGNSS mission on a global scale and using ancillary information about the overlying vegetation and the characteristics of the soil. The results open up further future perspectives for global, high-resolution SM products from spaceborne Global Navigation Satellite System-Reflectometry data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据