4.3 Editorial Material

Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: Time to Replace 17OHP with 21-Deoxycortisol

期刊

HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS
卷 91, 期 6, 页码 416-420

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000501396

关键词

Androgens; Congenital adrenal hyperplasia; Disorders of sexual development; Adrenal steroid; Hormone assay; Newborn; Screening

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) due to steroid 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21OHD) has a worldwide incidence of 1 in 15-20,000. Affected individuals have adrenal insufficiency and androgen excess; the androgen excess begins during fetal life, typically resulting in 46,XX disordered sexual development. In 21OHD, 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP), the steroid proximal to 21-hydroxylase, accumulates. Most industrialized countries have newborn screening programs that measure 17OHP; such screening has permitted rapid detection of newborns with 21OHD, saving lives previously lost to mineralocorticoid deficiency and salt wasting. However, newborn screening is plagued by false positives. 17OHP is above most cutoff values in the first 24 h of life, is high in otherwise normal premature infants, and in many term infants with physiologic stress from unrelated diseases. In addition, newborn 17OHP may be elevated in other forms of CAH, including 11-hydroxylase deficiency, 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency, and P450 oxidoreductase deficiency. In 21OHD, some of the accumulated intra-adrenal 17OHP is converted to 21-deoxycortisol (21-deoxy) by 11 beta-hydroxylase (CYP11B1); 21-deoxy is not elevated in premature infants or in other forms of CAH, and hence is a more specific marker for 21OHD. However, 21-deoxy assays have not been generally available until recently, hence experience is limited. We urge clinical investigators, commercial reference laboratories, and newborn screening programs to investigate replacing 17OHP with 21-deoxy as the analyte of choice for studies of 21OHD. (C) 2019 The Author Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据