4.3 Article

Relationship between the sharp decrease in dust storm frequency over East Asia and the abrupt loss of Arctic sea ice in the early 1980s

期刊

GEOLOGICAL MAGAZINE
卷 157, 期 5, 页码 729-740

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0016756819000967

关键词

East Asian dust storm; Arctic sea ice; 1980s regime shift; Rossby wave train

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0601904]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA20070103]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41690115]
  4. China's Ministry of Environmental Protection [DQGG0104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on dust storm frequency (DSF) data from the China Meteorological Administration, Arctic sea-ice concentration (SIC) data from the Hadley Centre, and atmospheric reanalysis data from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), temporal variations and regime shifts of East Asian DSF and Arctic SIC during 1961-2015 are revealed, and the possible relationship between them is explored. The results show that East Asian DSF in spring is closely associated with the preceding winter SIC from the northern Greenland Sea to the Barents Sea (20 degrees W-60 degrees E, 74.5 degrees N-78.5 degrees N). In the past half-century, both East Asian DSF and Arctic SIC have shown significant declining trends, with consistent regime shifts in the early 1980s. Further statistical analyses indicate that the abrupt decrease of East Asian DSF in spring may be attributed to the concurrent sharp loss of Arctic SIC in the preceding winter. It is the loss of Arctic SIC that causes the atmospheric circulation anomalies downstream by stimulating a Rossby wave train, resulting in decelerated wind speed, dampened vertical wind shear and restrained synoptic-scale disturbances over the dust source region, eventually leading to the decline in East Asian DSF over decadal timescales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据