4.3 Article

Epidemiology of Human Listeriosis in China During 2008-2017

期刊

FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 119-125

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2019.2683

关键词

Listeria monocytogenes; listeriosis; epidemiology; septicemia; CNS infection; sporadic

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC1601201, 2018YFD0500502]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31472193]
  3. Key Research and Development Program (Modern Agriculture) Project of Jiangsu Province [BE2017341]
  4. Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Independent Innovation Funds [CX(16)1028]
  5. Science and Technology Support Program of Jiangsu Province [BE2012367]
  6. Priority Academic Development Program of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Listeria monocytogenes is a facultative, intracellular foodborne pathogen that causes listeriosis and is prevalent worldwide. However, our knowledge of this bacterium and the listeriosis it causes is still extremely limited until now. Therefore, this retrospective study of patients in mainland China over 10 years (2008-2017) was performed to better understand the demographic trends and clinical features of listeriosis in China. Both electronic and manual retrieval systems were used to collect the relevant literature on listeriosis in mainland China. A total of 759 cases were reported from 22 provinces. Among the clinical cases, septicemia was the most common presentation (49%), followed by central nervous system infection (25%). The overall case fatality rate was 18%, with a higher rate among neonatal patients (73%). In recent years, listeriosis has been reported annually and even peaked in 2014. The median age of nonperinatal cases was 36 years (range, 0-102), with a predominance of male cases (52%). Sporadic cases were frequent from March to May. Efforts to prevent and control the spread of listeriosis are required through further research and collaborative efforts to improve the capacities of clinical diagnosis and treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据