4.7 Article

Impact of high hydrostatic pressure and thermal treatment on the stability and bioaccessibility of carotenoid and carotenoid esters in astringent persimmon (Diospyros kaki Thunb, var. Rojo Brillante)

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 538-549

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.05.017

关键词

Persimmon; Diospyros kaki; Rojo Brillante; Carotenoids; Carotenoid esters; Stability; Bioaccessibility; Pasteurization; High hydrostatic pressure; INFOGEST; Digestion

资金

  1. Spanish MINECO of Spanish Government [INIA RTA2015-00044-C02-02]
  2. international project FUNFOODEMERTEC - Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM, Mexico)
  3. CONACyT, Mexico [692751]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The carotenoid and carotenoid ester profile in astringent persimmon (Diospyros kaki Thunb., var. Rojo Brillante) was composed by 13 free xanthophylls, 8 hydrocarbon carotenes and 17 carotenoid esters. The stability and biaoccessibility of these carotenoids was determined by an adaptation of the INFOGEST protocol. Results showed that the stability of persimmon carotenoids ranged from 61 to 74%, depending on the digestion phase, being (all-E)-beta-cryptoxanthin and (all-E)-antheraxanthin 3-O-palmitate the most stable carotenoids. At the final step of the digestion (oral + gastric + duodenal phase), only traces of (all-E)-antheraxanthin, (all-E)-lutein and (all-E)-beta-cryptoxanthin were found in control samples due to the low efficiency of carotenoid micellization, which was affected by the high pectin content naturally present in persimmon tissues. Processing increased the overall carotenoid bioaccessibility to 54% in pressurized samples and to 25% in thermal treated ones. This effect depended on the processing technology as well as on the chemical structure of the carotenoid, being (all-E)-beta-cryptoxanthin and (all-E)-beta-cryptoxanthin laurate the most bioaccessible carotenoids in pressurized samples and (all-E)-beta-cryptoxanthin laurate and (all-E)-antheraxanthin the most bioaccessible ones in pasteurized ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据