4.5 Article

Effects of Fiber Dimension and Its Distribution on the Properties of Lyocell and Ramie Fibers Reinforced Polylactide Composites

期刊

FIBERS AND POLYMERS
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 1726-1732

出版社

KOREAN FIBER SOC
DOI: 10.1007/s12221-019-1171-3

关键词

Polylactide composites; Lyocell fiber; Ramie fiber; Fiber dimension; Distribution

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [16ZR1401600]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [16D110620]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The regenerated cellulose fiber (Lyocell) and natural cellulose fiber (ramie) with different initial lengths were used to reinforce polylactide (PLA) by melt compounding and injection molding. The fiber dimension and its distribution in composites after injection molding were analyzed by high-resolution Fiber Quality Analyzer (FQA). Moreover, the contents of small fibers with length < 0.2 mm were also provided by FQA. Then the influences of fiber dimension and its distribution on the mechanical properties of the composites were investigated. The results showed that fiber length was reduced during compounding and injection molding processes, and the longer the initial fiber length, the more severe the length declined. Compared with ramie fiber, Lyocell fiber showed a longer fiber length, smaller diameter and narrower width distribution in composite after injection molding. Additionally, the content of small fiber played an important role in the analysis of the relation between the fiber dimension and mechanical properties of composites owing to its smaller aspect ratio. The different mechanical characteristics of the PLA composites were attributed predominantly to the fiber aspect ratio and the small fiber content. By comparison, Lyocell fiber exhibited better reinforcement for PLA due to the higher aspect ratio and lower small fiber content. The tensile strength, tensile modulus and impact strength of Lyocell/PLA composite were increased by 8.61 %, 75.43 % and 26.9 %, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据