4.7 Article

Dynamics of the human skin mediator lipidome in response to dietary ω-3 fatty acid supplementation

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 33, 期 11, 页码 13014-13027

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201901501R

关键词

eicosapentaenoic acid; docosahexaenoic acid; inflammation; lipidomics; mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [WT094028/AIA, WT094028/B]
  2. National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network (CRN)
  3. NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  5. University of Manchester Strategic Fund
  6. Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP), Republik Indonesia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nutritional supplementation with fish oil or omega-3 (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) has potential benefits for skin inflammation. Although the differential metabolism of the main n-3PUFA eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) could lead to distinct activities, there are no clinical studies comparing their relative efficacy in human skin. Following a 10-wk oral supplementation of healthy volunteers and using mass spectrometry-based lipidomics, we found that n-3PUFA mainly affected the epidermal mediator lipidome. EPA was more efficient than DHA in reducing production of arachidonic acid-derived lipids, and both n-3PUFA lowered N-acyl ethanolamines. In UV radiation-challenged skin (3 times the minimum erythemal dose), EPA attenuated the production of proinflammatory lipids, whereas DHA abrogated the migration of Langerhans cells, as assessed by immunohistochemistry. Interestingly, n-3PUFA increased the infiltration of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells but did not alter the erythemal response, either the sunburn threshold or the resolution of erythema, as assessed by spectrophotometric hemoglobin index readings. As EPA and DHA differentially impact cutaneous inflammation through changes in the network of epidermal lipids and dendritic and infiltrating immune cells, they should be considered separately when designing interventions for cutaneous disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据