4.7 Article

A new parsimonious AHP methodology: Assigning priorities to many objects by comparing pairwise few reference objects

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 109-120

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.02.036

关键词

Analytic hierarchy process; Parsimonious preference information; Pairwise comparison matrix

资金

  1. research project Data analytics for entrepreneurial ecosystems, sustainable development and wellbeing indices' of the Department of Economics and Business of the University of Catania
  2. University of Catania

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a development of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) permitting to use the methodology also for decision problems with a very large number of alternatives and several criteria. While the application of the original AHP method involves many pairwise comparisons between considered objects. that can be alternatives with respect to considered criteria or criteria between them, our parsimonious proposal is composed of five steps: (i) direct evaluation of the objects at hand: (ii) selection of some reference objects: (iii) application of the original AHP method to the reference objects: (iv) check of the consistency of the pairwise comparisons of AHP and the compatibility between the rating and the prioritization with a subsequent discussion with the decision maker who can modify the rating or pairwise comparisons of reference objects: (v) revision of the direct evaluation on the basis of the prioritization supplied by AHP on reference objects. Our approach permits to avoid the distortion of comparing more relevant objects (reference points) with less relevant objects. Moreover, our AHP approach avoids rank reversal problems, that is. changes of the order in the prioritizations due to adding or removing one or more objects from the set of considered objects. The new proposal has been tested and experimentally validated. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据