4.5 Review

The cellular prion protein and its derived fragments in human prion diseases and their role as potential biomarkers

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
卷 19, 期 11, 页码 1007-1018

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2019.1667231

关键词

Human prion diseases; sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; protein misfolding; aggregation; neurodegeneration

资金

  1. Werner-Otto-Stiftung, Hamburg
  2. American CJD Foundation
  3. Alzheimer Forschung Initiative (AFI) [17022]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Health-Instituto Carlos III [Miguel Servet programme] [CP16/00041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Human prion diseases are a heterogeneous group of incurable and debilitating conditions characterized by a progressive degeneration of the central nervous system. The conformational changes of the cellular prion protein and its formation into an abnormal isoform, spongiform degeneration, neuronal loss, and neuroinflammation are central to prion disease pathogenesis. It has been postulated that truncated variants of aggregation-prone proteins are implicated in neurodegenerative mechanisms. An increasing body of evidence indicates that proteolytic fragments and truncated variants of the prion protein are formed and accumulated in the brain of prion disease patients. These prion protein variants provide a high degree of relevance to disease pathology and diagnosis. Areas covered: In the present review, we summarize the current knowledge on the occurrence of truncated prion protein species and their potential roles in pathophysiological states during prion diseases progression. In addition, we discuss their usability as a diagnostic biomarker in prion diseases. Expert opinion: Either as a primary factor in the formation of prion diseases or as a consequence from neuropathological affection, abnormal prion protein variants and fragments may provide independent information about mechanisms of prion conversion, pathological states, or disease progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据