4.6 Article

Effect of iPSCs-derived keratinocytes on healing of full-thickness skin wounds in mice

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 385, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111627

关键词

iPSCs-derived keratinocytes; Epithelialization; Scar; Collagen; alpha-SMA; MMP1; TNF-alpha

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81501677, 81772095, 81872514]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2016A030313575, 2014A030312013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) provide new approaches for the management of severe skin wound healing due to their infinite proliferative capacity, pluripotency into multiple lineages, and important ethical acceptability. In this study, we aimed to differentiate iPSCs into keratinocytes and to observe the therapeutic effects of transplanted iPSCs-derived keratinocytes on wound healing in mice. Here, mouse iPSCs had been successfully differentiated into keratinocytes. Next, iPSCs-derived keratinocytes labeled by CSFE were injected directly into the full-thickness skin wound. Hematoxylin & Eosin, Masson's trichrome, EdU staining and immunohistochemical staining were performed to assess the effects of iPSCs-derived keratinocytes on wound healing. Our results showed that transplantation of iPSCs-derived keratinocytes into full-thickness skin wound site accelerated re-epithelialization and reduced scar formation. In addition, we found that conditioned medium of iPSCs-derived keratinocytes reduced the expression of alpha-SMA and COL1 and increased the expression of MMP1 in fibroblasts in vitro. Further mechanism studies show the TNF-alpha-induced activation of NF-kappa B is involved in the effect of conditioned medium of iPSCs-derived keratinocytes on fibroblasts. In conclusion, this study has shown that iPSCs-derived keratinocytes decrease the healing time by increasing the epithelization rate and reduce scarring, suggesting a possible new treatment for skin wound healing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据