4.5 Article

Additive genetic variance for lifetime fitness and the capacity for adaptation in an annual plant

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 73, 期 9, 页码 1746-1758

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/evo.13830

关键词

Adaptive capacity; aster models; Chamaecrista fasciculata; Fisher's Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection; genotype-by-environment interactions

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB 1257462]
  2. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project [1016272]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The immediate capacity for adaptation under current environmental conditions is directly proportional to the additive genetic variance for fitness, V-A(W). Mean absolute fitness, W over bar , is predicted to change at the rate VA(W)W over bar , according to Fisher's Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection. Despite ample research evaluating degree of local adaptation, direct assessment of V-A(W) and the capacity for ongoing adaptation is exceedingly rare. We estimated V-A(W) and W over bar in three pedigreed populations of annual Chamaecrista fasciculata, over three years in the wild. Contrasting with common expectations, we found significant V-A(W) in all populations and years, predicting increased mean fitness in subsequent generations (0.83 to 6.12 seeds per individual). Further, we detected two cases predicting evolutionary rescue, where selection on standing V-A(W) was expected to increase fitness of declining populations (W over bar < 1.0) to levels consistent with population sustainability and growth. Within populations, inter-annual differences in genetic expression of fitness were striking. Significant genotype-by-year interactions reflected modest correlations between breeding values across years, indicating temporally variable selection at the genotypic level that could contribute to maintaining V-A(W). By directly estimating V-A(W) and total lifetime W over bar , our study presents an experimental approach for studies of adaptive capacity in the wild.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据