4.5 Article

Tracing local and regional clusters of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae ST512 with whole genome sequencing, Finland, 2013 to 2018

期刊

EUROSURVEILLANCE
卷 24, 期 38, 页码 7-15

出版社

EUR CENTRE DIS PREVENTION & CONTROL
DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.38.1800522

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Two epidemiologically-unrelated clusters of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)producing K. pneumoniae were detected among several healthcare facilities (HCF) in Finland by routine surveillance using whole genome sequencing (WGS). Aim: The objective was to investigate transmission chains to stop further spread of the responsible strain. Methods: In this observational retrospective study, cases were defined as patients with K. pneumoniae KPC-3 sequence type (ST)512 strain detected in Finland from August 2013 to May 2018. Environmental specimens were obtained from surfaces, sinks and toilets in affected wards. WGS was performed on K. pneumoniae cultures using Illumina MiSeq platform and data were analysed using Ridom SeqShere software K. pneumoniae core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) scheme. Epidemiological information of the cases was provided by HCFs. Results: We identified 20 cases in six HCFs: clusteri included 18 cases in five HCFs and cluster2 two cases in one HCF. In clusteri, a link with a foreign country was unclear, 6/18 cases without overlapping stay had occupied the same room in one of the five HCFs within >3 years. In cluster 2, the index case was transferred from abroad, both cases occupied the same room 8 months apart. A strain identical to that of the two cases in cgMLST was isolated from the toilet of the room, suggesting a clonal origin. Conclusions: The clusters were mostly related to case transfer between facilities and likely involved environmental transmission. We show that CPE surveillance using WGS and collaboration between hospitals are crucial to identify clusters and trace transmission chains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据