4.5 Article

Evaluation of a computer-aided method for measuring the Cobb angle on chest X-rays

期刊

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 3035-3043

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-06115-w

关键词

Chest X-rays; Cobb angle; Computer-aided; Deep learning; Scoliosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives To automatically measure the Cobb angle and diagnose scoliosis on chest X-rays, a computer-aided method was proposed and the reliability and accuracy were evaluated. Methods Two Mask R-CNN models as the core of a computer-aided method were used to separately detect and segment the spine and all vertebral bodies on chest X-rays, and the Cobb angle of the spinal curve was measured from the output of the Mask R-CNN models. To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of the computer-aided method, the Cobb angles on 248 chest X-rays from lung cancer screening were measured automatically using a computer-aided method, and two experienced radiologists used a manual method to separately measure Cobb angles on the aforementioned chest X-rays. Results For manual measurement of the Cobb angle on chest X-rays, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of intra- and inter-observer reliability analysis was 0.941 and 0.887, respectively, and the mean absolute differences were < 3.5 degrees. The ICC between the computer-aided and manual methods for Cobb angle measurement was 0.854, and the mean absolute difference was 3.32 degrees. These results indicated that the computer-aided method had good reliability for Cobb angle measurement on chest X-rays. Using the mean value of Cobb angles in manual measurements > 10 degrees as a reference standard for scoliosis, the computer-aided method achieved a high level of sensitivity (89.59%) and a relatively low level of specificity (70.37%) for diagnosing scoliosis on chest X-rays. Conclusion The computer-aided method has potential for automatic Cobb angle measurement and scoliosis diagnosis on chest X-rays. Graphic abstract These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据