4.5 Article

Supportive care needs: An aspect of Thai women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 82-87

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.05.008

关键词

Supportive care needs; Breast cancer; Chemotherapy; Qualitative study

资金

  1. Chulalongkom University 90th year Anniversary Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This study was conducted to explore supportive care needs of Thai women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Methods: Through qualitative interviews, a convenience sample of ten women with invasive and advanced invasive breast cancer who were undergoing chemotherapy were interviewed. Treatment for all women took place at a regional hospital in lower northern Thailand. Ten participants were interviewed, some more than once, for a total of 18 interviews. A qualitative approach with a semi-structured interview guideline was used in data collection. Content analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: Four major themes were found: 1) the need for physical comfort and health safety, 2) the need for encouragement, 3) the need for solution of financial problems, and 4) the need for communication and useful information. This qualitative investigation found that supportive care needs of Thai women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy are essential for nurses to know in order to provide high quality care. Conclusions: Improvement of supportive care quality for women with breast cancer who are undergoing chemotherapy in Thai culture should include: 1) access to supportive care needs assessment, 2) proactive dissemination of necessary information for better management of their lives, 3) aids to daily living and psychosocial support, and 4) facilitation of easy access to welfare and finance help. Provision of supportive care from both families and health care teams could improve the quality of life and so ease the women's lives for Thai women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据