4.5 Article

Volatile anesthetic sevoflurane pretreatment alleviates hypoxia-induced potentiation of excitatory inputs to striatal medium spiny neurons of mice

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 50, 期 9, 页码 3520-3530

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14524

关键词

ATP-sensitive potassium channels; excitotoxicity; hypoxia; sevoflurane

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sevoflurane, a commonly used anesthetic in surgery, has drawn attention because of its preconditioning effects in hypoxic conditions. To investigate the preconditioning effects in the striatum, a common site for ischemic stroke, we collected whole-cell current-clamp recordings from striatal medium spiny neurons. In our in vitro brain slice experiments, deprivation of oxygen and glucose depolarized the striatal neurons to subthreshold potentials, and the pre-administration of sevoflurane (4%, 15 min) prolonged the time to depolarization. Furthermore, transient hypoxia induced the potentiation of excitatory postsynaptic potentials, which play a part in post-ischemic excitotoxicity. Glibenclamide, a K-ATP channel inhibitor, reversed the prolonged time to depolarization and the prevention of the pathological potentiation of excitatory responses, indicating that the short exposure to sevoflurane likely participates in neuroprotection against hypoxia via activation of K-ATP channels. A monocarboxylate transporter blocker, 4-CIN, also depolarized striatal neurons. Interestingly, the blockade of monocarboxylate transporters that supply lactate to neurons caused the pathological potentiation, even in the presence of enough oxygen and glucose. In this case, sevoflurane could not prevent the pathological potentiation, suggesting the involvement of monocarboxylate transporters in the sevoflurane-mediated effects. These results indicate that sevoflurane protects striatal neurons from hypoxic damage and alleviates the pathological potentiation. Under these conditions, sevoflurane may become an effective intervention for patients undergoing surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据