4.5 Article

Older Australians are eating more protein: Secondary analysis of the 1995 & 2011/12 national nutrition surveys

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 74, 期 4, 页码 588-597

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41430-019-0478-x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Objectives Diet is important in healthy ageing. Protein is essential for physical function, immunity, maintaining quality of life and ability to live independently. Subjects/Methods Protein intakes, sources and the protein content of meals and snacks among adults aged >= 65 years from the 1995 National Nutrition Survey (n = 1960) and the 2011/12 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 2103) were examined. Usual protein intakes were estimated using the National Cancer Institute method, and intakes and adequacy were compared between the two surveys. Results Participants reported a higher total protein intake in 2011/12 than 1995 (81.0 vs. 73.4 g, p < 0.001). Mean protein intake per kg body weight (1995, 1.0 g/kg vs. 2011/12, 1.1 g/kg) and ability to meet the Australian (1995, 85% vs. 2011/12, 88%) and World Health Organisation (1995, 90% vs. 2011/12, 94%) protein requirements increased over time. Males >70 years or those with poor self-assessed health status were more likely to report inadequate protein intake compared with other respondents. Higher protein intake was associated with greater consumption of vegetables, fruit, dairy products, meat and alternatives and lower consumption of discretionary foods and alcohol. Participants obtained 17% of their protein intake from breakfast, 30% from lunch, 43% from dinner and 10% from snacks. Main protein sources included lean red meat, poultry and full cream milk. Conclusion Specific dietary advice for older Australians, particularly older men and those with poor health, to promote healthy food choices with adequate protein content is needed for disease prevention and maintenance of quality of life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据