4.5 Article

Resistance reported from China antimicrobial surveillance network (CHINET) in 2018

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-019-03673-1

关键词

Bacterial resistance surveillance; Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus; Carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study is to investigate the antimicrobial susceptibility of strains isolated from the major hospitals in China. A total of 44 teaching hospitals were involved. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted by Kirby-Bauer automated systems, and results were interpreted using CLSI criteria. Totally 244,843 strains were isolated in 2018, of which gram-negative bacilli and gram-positive cocci were accounting for 71.8% and 28.2%, respectively. 39.7% of isolates were cultured from lower respiratory tract, 18.8% from urine, 14.8% from blood, 1.3% from cerebrospinal fluid, respectively. Of those, the five major species were most often isolated (65.5%, 63%, 52.3%, and 30.3%). The resistance rate of MRSA to most antimicrobial agents was significantly higher than that of MSSA strains, except for to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in urine specimen. E.coli was still highly susceptible to carbapenem antibiotics, and the resistance rate was less than 5%. Carbapenem resistance among Klebsiella pneumoniae, especially cultured from cerebrospinal fluid, increased significance from 18.6 to 64.1%. The resistance rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to carbapenems were nearly 30% in the blood, in urine, and in the lower respiratory tract, but about 60% of that in cerebrospinal fluid. About 80% of Acinetobacter baumannii strains was resistant to imipenem and meropenem, respectively. Bacterial resistance of five major clinical isolates from cerebrospinal fluid to common antibiotics (in particular Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae) currently shows an increasing trend. It is worth to emphasize the importance of serious control of hospital infection and better management of clinical use of antimicrobial agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据