4.7 Article

Deep neural networks are superior to dermatologists in melanoma image classification

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 11-17

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.023

关键词

Deep learning; Melanoma; Skin cancer; Artificial intelligence

类别

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Health in Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Melanoma is the most dangerous type of skin cancer but is curable if detected early. Recent publications demonstrated that artificial intelligence is capable in classifying images of benign nevi and melanoma with dermatologist-level precision. However, a statistically significant improvement compared with dermatologist classification has not been reported to date. Methods: For this comparative study, 4204 biopsy-proven images of melanoma and nevi (1:1) were used for the training of a convolutional neural network (CNN). New techniques of deep learning were integrated. For the experiment, an additional 804 biopsy-proven dermoscopic images of melanoma and nevi (1:1) were randomly presented to dermatologists of nine German university hospitals, who evaluated the quality of each image and stated their recommended treatment (19,296 recommendations in total). Three McNemar's tests comparing the results of the CNN's test runs in terms of sensitivity, specificity and overall correctness were predefined as the main outcomes. Findings: The respective sensitivity and specificity of lesion classification by the dermatologists were 67.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.6%-71.7%) and 62.2% (95% CI: 57.6%-66.9%). In comparison, the trained CNN achieved a higher sensitivity of 82.3% (95% CI: 78.3%-85.7%) and a higher specificity of 77.9% (95% CI: 73.8%-81.8%). The three McNemar's tests in 2 x 2 tables all reached a significance level of p < 0.001. This significance level was sustained for both subgroups. Interpretation: For the first time, automated dermoscopic melanoma image classification was shown to be significantly superior to both junior and board-certified dermatologists (p < 0.001). (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据