4.8 Article

Multi-scale Modeling of Nutrient Pollution in the Rivers of China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 53, 期 16, 页码 9614-9625

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b07352

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFE0103100]
  2. Wageningen Institute for Environment and Climate Research (WIMEK) of Wageningen University & Research, National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0800106]
  3. Hundred Talent Program of the Chinese Academy of Science
  4. Distinguished Young Scientists Project of Natural Science Foundation of Hebei [D2017503023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chinese surface waters are severely polluted by nutrients. This study addresses three challenges in nutrient modeling for rivers in China: (1) difficulties in transferring modeling results across biophysical and administrative scales, (2) poor representation of the locations of point sources, and (3) limited incorporation of the direct discharge of manure to rivers. The objective of this study is, therefore, to quantify inputs of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) to Chinese rivers from different sources at multiple scales. We developed a novel multi-scale modeling approach including a detailed, state-of-the-art representation of point sources of nutrients in rivers. The model results show that the river pollution and source attributions differ among spatial scales. Point sources accounted for 75% of the total dissolved phosphorus (TDP) inputs to rivers in China in 2012, and diffuse sources accounted for 72% of the total dissolved nitrogen (TDN) inputs. One-third of the sub-basins accounted for more than half of the pollution. Downscaling to the smallest scale (polygons) reveals that 14% and 9% of the area contribute to more than half of the calculated TDN and TDP pollution, respectively. Sources of pollution vary considerably among and within counties. Clearly, multi-scale modeling may help to develop effective policies for water pollution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据