4.7 Article

Heterogeneous photo-Fenton degradation of formaldehyde using MIL-100(Fe) under visible light irradiation

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 251, 期 -, 页码 783-791

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.143

关键词

Formaldehyde; MIL-100(Fe); Wastewater treatment; Photo-fenton processes; Design-expert software

资金

  1. Nanotechnology Research Institute of Shiraz University
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Removal of toxic formaldehyde from environmental waters is crucial to maintain ecosystem sustainability and human health. In this work, MIL-100(Fe) as a heterogeneous Fenton-like photocatalyst was used for the treatment of formaldehyde-contaminated water. The MIL-100(Fe) was synthesized via a facile solvothermal method and fully characterized using different spectroscopic and microscopic techniques. Based on the results, the formation of highly porous, crystalline, and stable visible light-responsive MIL-100(Fe) was confirmed. The Fenton-like photocatalytic efficiency of the MIL-100(Fe) toward the degradation of formaldehyde was then studied under visible light irradiation. For this purpose, the effect of initial concentration of formaldehyde, photocatalyst dose, H2O2 concentration, solution pH, and contact time on the removal efficiency of the MIL-100(Fe) was investigated using central composite design. The obtained results showed that the removal efficiency of the MIL-100(Fe) is significantly affected by the initial concentration of formaldehyde. A second-order model with R-2 = 0.93 was developed for the system that was able to adequately predict the percentage removal of formaldehyde by the MIL-100(Fe) under different experimental conditions. According to the numerical optimization results, by using 1.13 g L-1 photocatalyst and 0.055 mol L-1 H2O2, 93% of formaldehyde can be removed after 119 min from an aqueous solution containing 700 mg L-1 of formaldehyde at pH 6.54. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据