4.7 Article

Microplastics uptake and egestion dynamics in Pacific oysters, Magallana gigas (Thunberg, 1793), under controlled conditions

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 252, 期 -, 页码 742-748

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.002

关键词

Microplastic; Pacific oyster; Uptake dynamics; Depuration; Consumers risks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microplastics debris (<5 mm) are increasingly abundant in the marine environment, therefore, potentially becoming a growing threat for different marine organisms. Through aquatic animals, these can enter in the human food chain, and can be perceived as a risk for consumers' health. Different studies report the presence of particles in marketable shellfish including the world wide commercially grown Pacific oyster Magallana gigas (Thunberg, 1793). The aim of this study is to examine the potential risk of microplastics entering in the human food chain through this shellfish species, investigating the dynamics of the uptake, egestion (faeces) and rejection (pseudofaeces) of microplastics in Pacific oysters under controlled conditions. M. gigas collected from a farm in the San Teodoro lagoon (Italy), were exposed to 60 fluorescent orange polystyrene particles L-1 of known sizes (100, 250 and 500 mu m). The uptake of each particle size was 19.4 +/- 1.1%, 19.4 +/- 2% and 12.9 +/- 2% respectively. After exposure M. gigas were left to depurate for 72 h, during which 84.6 +/- 2% of the particles taken up were released whilst 15.4 +/- 2% were retained inside the shell cavity. No microplastic particles were found in the animals' soft tissues. The results of this study, suggest that depuration is an effective method to reduce presence of large microplastic particles, in the size range 100-500 mu m, in M. gigas. Importantly, the data suggests that the burden that could theoretically be up taken by consumers from these shellfish is negligible when compared to other routes. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据