4.6 Article

Geomicrobiology of the carbon, nitrogen and sulphur cycles in Powell Lake: a permanently stratified water column containing ancient seawater

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 21, 期 10, 页码 3927-3952

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14743

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canada Excellence Research Chair in Ocean Science and Technology
  2. NSERC Discovery Grant
  3. Killam Predoctoral Scholarship
  4. Nova Scotia Research and Innovation Graduate Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the first geomicrobiological characterization of the meromictic water column of Powell Lake (British Columbia, Canada), a former fjord, which has been stably stratified since the last glacial period. Its deepest layers (300-350 m) retain isolated, relict seawater from that period. Fine-scale vertical profiling of the water chemistry and microbial communities allowed subdivision of the water column into distinct geomicrobiological zones. These zones were further characterized by phylogenetic and functional marker genes from amplicon and shotgun metagenome sequencing. Binning of metagenomic reads allowed the linkage of function to specific taxonomic groups. Statistical analyses (analysis of similarities, Bray-Curtis similarity) confirmed that the microbial community structure followed closely the geochemical zonation. Yet, our characterization of the genetic potential relevant to carbon, nitrogen and sulphur cycling of each zone revealed unexpected features, including potential for facultative anaerobic methylotrophy, nitrogen fixation despite high ammonium concentrations and potential micro-aerobic nitrifiers within the chemocline. At the oxic-suboxic interface, facultative anaerobic potential was found in the widespread freshwater lineage acI (Actinobacteria), suggesting intriguing ecophysiological similarities to the marine SAR11. Evolutionary divergent lineages among diverse phyla were identified in the ancient seawater zone and may indicate novel adaptations to this unusual environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据