4.3 Article

Consumption of cereal leaf beetle, Oulema melanopus, by generalist predators in wheat fields detected by molecular analysis

期刊

ENTOMOLOGIA EXPERIMENTALIS ET APPLICATA
卷 168, 期 1, 页码 59-69

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eea.12835

关键词

gut content analysis; half-lives; lady beetles; nabid bugs; wolf spiders; Coleoptera; Chrysomelidae; integrated pest management; Coccinella septempunctata; Nabis americoferus; Hippodamia parenthesis

资金

  1. University of Manitoba
  2. Pesticide Risk Reduction Program of AAFC's Pest Management Centre [PRR13-020, PRR16-020]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council [418678-2012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cereal leaf beetle (CLB), Oulema melanopus L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), is a major pest of cereal crops that has recently been reported in western Canada. We developed a set of primers to detect CLB DNA in the gut of six common predator taxa in wheat fields: lady beetles (20 positives of 143 individuals), nabid bugs (73 positives of 206 individuals), and wolf spiders (2 positives of 25 individuals). Nabis americoferus Carayon (Hemiptera: Nabidae) and Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) were the most abundant predators in cereal fields, with 0.35 and 0.05 proportion of samples positive for CLB DNA, respectively. The prey DNA half-lives were used to adjust the estimates for N. americoferus to 0.22, due to its longer DNA detectability relative to C. septempunctata. Overall, Hippodamia parenthesis (Say) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) had the highest proportion of positives at 0.43. There was a positive association between CLB abundance and proportion of N. americoferus and C. septempunctata positives for CLB DNA. This study highlights the contribution of generalist predators to CLB mortality and their important role in integrated management for CLB. Furthermore, we provide a molecular tool that can be used to identify predators of CLB and predation frequency in agricultural fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据