4.7 Article

Modeling coordination between renewables and grid: Policies to mitigate distribution grid constraints using residential PV-battery systems

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 1017-1033

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.024

关键词

Residential storage; Renewable integration; Distribution system operator; Prosumage; Policy; Multi-level games; MPEC

资金

  1. Reiner Lemoine-Stiftung
  2. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  3. German Ministry for Education and Research [01LA1811C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Distributed photo-voltaic (PV) generation is one of the pillars of energy transitions around the world, but its deployment in the distribution grid requires costly reinforcements and expansions. Prosumage - consisting of a household-level PV unit coupled with a battery storage system - has been proposed as an effective means to facilitate the integration of renewable energy sources and reduce distribution grid stress. However, tapping its full potential requires regulatory interventions; otherwise, system costs could rise despite increasing flexibility. We analyze the effectiveness of different policy schemes to mitigate the need for distribution capacity expansion by incentivizing beneficial storage operation. Our novel top-down modeling approach allows analyzing effects on market prices, storage dispatch, induced distribution grid requirements, system costs, and distributional implications. Based on German power system data, numerical results indicate that distribution grid requirements can be reduced through simple feed-in policies. A uniform limit on maximum grid feed-in can leave distribution system operators better off, even if they fully compensate prosumage households for foregone revenue. Policies imposing more differentiated limits at the regional level result in only marginal efficiency improvements. Complete self-sufficiency (autarky) is socially undesirable, as it confines important balancing potential and can increase system costs despite adding storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据